The point of departure for both the Industrial Policy Action Plan (IPAP) and South Africa’s Trade Policy and Strategy Framework (TPSF) is that, for sustained growth and development, South Africa cannot rely on the export potential of its mineral resources and other commodities alone. There is a pressing need for more diversification. This requires promotion of increased value addition into non-traditional tradable goods that compete in export markets as well as against imports. High value-added goods, besides operating in dynamic high-growth markets, are also more labour-intensive. The NGP identifies manufacturing as one of the employment drivers.
The customs tariff implications of this premise are that, tariffs on mature capital-intensive upstream input industries may be reviewed and may be reduced or removed in the interest of lowering input costs into labour-intensive employment creating downstream activities.
Tariffs on downstream industries, particularly those that are strategic from an employment perspective, may be retained on in some instances raised. Tariffs are instruments of industrial policy and have implications for capital accumulation, technological progress, productivity growth, and employment. Changes to the tariff structure need to be calibrated to the production possibilities of each sector. The tariff investigations based on applications received or self-initiated are conducted on a case-by-case basis informed by the peculiarities of each sector and supported by evidence.
ITAC is now placing more emphasis on the principle of reciprocity when granting tariff support to industries, varying from one sector to another. This means tariff amendments will be conditioned on a commitment by beneficiaries on how they will perform against government’s set policy objectives, in particular employment and investment. Tariff increases will also be tied to a specific period of time after which tariffs may be reviewed. Therefore, ITAC takes a strategic approach to customs tariffs. It is an approach that is also sensitive to employment outcomes.
In light of the unique production and trade conditions for agricultural products, ITAC has adopted a differentiated approach compared to industrial goods. Subsidies and domestic support offered in developed countries to their agriculture sector have the effect of depressing world prices to the disadvantage of domestic farmers. In addition, farmers do not have bargaining power as they are price takers in the food value chain.
The fluctuation in world prices has to be factored in, when determining an appropriate level of the tariff. Tariff setting for agricultural products is more challenging in that not only the profitability of farmers must be taken into account but also the price ramifications down the value chain and the price raising effects for consumers, in particular the poor.
Agro-processing contributes, not just to increase high value-added exports and employment, but also improves the geographical spread of economic activities to rural areas. Tariff support for agro-processing goods down the food value chain, will be considered on a case-by-case basis.